![]() ![]() The biggest advantage of using ProPresenter for us was the ability to have multiple outputs to multiple displays. ![]() Using ProPresenter to integrate into our current production rig, saves us both time and resources. Given that most services depend on volunteers, it was becoming increasingly difficult to have the manpower required to run these different systems. Cloud sync being a "extra" rather than being included in the pricing structure also sounds strange, but it makes sense for software that is purchased for a greater one-time charge rather than a monthly or annual subscription because bandwidth is not free for anyone.Ĭomments: From the time we decided to take the plunge to having used it for years now, working on ProPresenter has been such a great delight. I don't anticipate that changing, and it might not be necessary for the company to succeed, but it raises the question of whether it is actually better to promote PC use if the support is subpar. The church is at a disadvantage with this program because it hasn't invested in Mac hardware. Our major complaint was that PC releases and support lagged so far behind Mac. Additionally, the efficiency of team communication is greatly increased by the multi-user features combined with cloud sync. For a church that uses SongSelect for lyrics and other purposes, the SongSelect integration is unquestionably the most helpful feature. I adore how different media platforms and source types are combined. ProPresenter needs to pay close attention to its user base and identify the key problems with the program. Slideshows or other media content can be displayed with ProPresenter for church live events or displays, but there are a number of quirks, flaws, and faults with this program as well as crucial capabilities that are hidden under tiny buttons that need to be resolved. The user interface and integrated content resources were the two key factors in the switch, among others. I switched over as soon as I learned about ProPresenter. However, it had drawbacks of its own, just like the majority of presenting software. ![]() Apple's Keynote software (free with every Mac) is a great model for easily creating high quality visuals.Ĭomments: I had been using MediaShout for a while and first thought it was great. Also, for the price, the image (slide) editing functions are clunky - usable, but not good. We don't have this problem with PowerPoint, Keynote or Proclaim. ProPresenter 6 does not correctly initialize the screen buffers causing us to quit and restart the program almost every time we use it. In our particular setup - iMac with a Kramer VGA video splitter, in 4:3 - 1024x768 res. We have used ProPresenter with PowerPoint, Keynote and Proclaim software concurrently and switch between them with almost no difficulties. I like that you can click on graphics and text images to make visuals on the fly. The weekly task of creating the worship flow for our services is easy and works relatively well. ProPresenter 6 is good at sequencing images, allowing videos to be used as backgrounds, and the database of user created material works well. While our two graphic-op volunteers are fairly new to worship graphics software, I have been creating presentations using computer graphics software professionally since 1983. For general worship visuals I prefer ProPresenter 6 by far. We also use Proclaim to record our teachings - audio with synced visuals - for uploading to our website. ![]() Our teachers prefer Proclaim due to its integration with Logos bible software. Additionally, having cloud sync as an 'extra' rather than built into the payment model seems a bit backwards - but for a software that is bought for a larger one-time fee rather than monthly/annual subscription, it makes sense as bandwidth is not free for anyone.Ĭomments: We use ProPresenter 6 weekly to sequence our worship lyrics and other service visuals except for the weekly teaching portions. I don't expect that to change, and it may not need to for the company to be successful, but it makes you ask if it's really better to support PC use if the support is inferior. Not investing in Mac hardware puts the church at a disadvantage with this software. The biggest issue we had was with releases/support for PC lagging so far behind Mac. Also, the multi-user features coupled with cloud sync make team collaboration so much more efficient. The SongSelect integration is by far the most useful feature for a church that relies on SongSelect for lyrics etc. I love the integration of various media types and source material platforms. Comments: We were able to expedite the service preparation process incredibly with the media integration available through ProPresenter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |